# Editorial review

- Article:
- Version or revision:
- Editor:
- Review date:

## Reader value
- [ ] Answers the question in the brief
- [ ] Contains a useful example or original insight
- [ ] Explains limitations and exceptions

## Accuracy
- [ ] Factual claims checked against original sources
- [ ] Numbers, dates, and quotes verified
- [ ] Product descriptions reflect current behavior
- [ ] Specialist claims reviewed by a qualified person
- [ ] No unsupported promises

## Structure and access
- [ ] Descriptive headings in a logical order
- [ ] Links work and have meaningful text
- [ ] Images have appropriate alternative text
- [ ] Title and description match the content
- [ ] Mobile layout checked

## Publish
- [ ] Destination and author confirmed
- [ ] Schedule and time zone checked
- [ ] Final version approved

## Decision
- Status: needs revision / approved
- Open issues and owners:
- Approved by: